Friday, October 19, 2012

Japanese Lake Provides More Definitive Record of Carbon-14 Levels

Bill Sweet
Friday, October 19, 2012
IEEE Spectrum: Inside Technology
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/environment/japanese-lake-provides-more-definitive-record-of-carbon14-levels

Summary
Thirteen years ago, an team of scientists created a record of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and temperatures dating back 420,000 years (shown in chart below). This chart has been invaluable in climate science, emphasizing the relationship between greenhouse gases and temperatures. Some have skepticized that the leads and lags in the record suggest that temperature changes cause changes in greenhouse gases, instead of vice versa. The roadblock in finding out whether or not this is true, is that there has not been a developed record of carbon-14 concentrations in the atmosphere dating back beyond 12,000 years ago, which would help to clear up various theories about the last ice age. But this week, an account of yearly changes in C-14 levels in the atmosphere dating back more than 50,000 years was published based on the sediments in a Japanese lake. These concentrations vary throughout time, and this new chart provides a greater solution for the periods that have previously been unclear and could show a more detailed history of solar activity, a factor in climate change. This Japanese lake, Lake Suigetsu, is surrounded by trees whose leaves drop into the water, falling to the bottom of the lake every year, and has been virtually undisturbed for thousands of years. Using carbon dating, the concentrations of C-14 found in the leaf layers help improve carbon dating and unveil a record of radiocarbon levels and local climate changes. These can be compared with other climate records to see how climate changes in different parts of the world relate to each other, and where it leads and lags. According to scientist Paula J. Reimer, this new record "stretches back over the full length of the radiocarbon age scale," helping to improve the accuracy at which radiocarbon dates are converted to calendar time.

Connection
This article is connected to the matter and energy and ecosystems units. It connects to Matter and Energy because carbon-14 is a radioactive isotope which decays over time and helps researchers to determine dates of the organic objects they are dating. Also, this article relates ecology because of carbon cycle impacts. The releasing of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is what the graph above is based on. The increase in carbon dioxide and other gases have contributed to the greenhouse effect, causing temperature and climate change on Earth.

4 comments:

  1. What are some other ways to date things beyond 12,000 years ago?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some other ways to date things beyond 12,000 years old include stratigraphy, electromagnetic dating, chemical dating, and other forms of radiometric dating. Stratigraphy is a dating technique that dates objects based on where they were found in a geological deposit or formation, for example, layers of sediment. Electromagnetic dating uses electrical and magnetic charges that build up or change at a fixed rate to determine the date of an object. An example of chemical dating is obsidian hydration dating, where the hydration rate of a specific obsidian composition is mostly constant, and an object with obsidian that has been trapped in a place where water is present can be dated according to the absorption of water in the obsidian. Radiometric dating was used for this, but compounds other than carbon can also be used such as potassium-aragon dating and ionium-thorium dating.
      For more information: http://www.sourcinginnovation.com/archaeology/Arch08.htm

      Delete
  2. Is this way of tracking the gas levels accurate? Would certain trees from other areas be affected differently in a variety of parts of the world?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, this way of tracking gas levels is pretty accurate. The carbon levels in the atmosphere are pretty constant throughout the world because the air is constantly circulating, so the trees would be exposed to different air masses and would most likely have similar results.

    ReplyDelete